This week, state House and Senate committees are considering portions of a proposed education reform package that has sparked howls of protest throughout Michigan.
The bills' timing coincides with the waning terms of "lame duck" lawmakers who have only a few weeks left to serve and little to lose by potentially pushing through parts of the controversial legislation that would transform education in Michigan.
Supporters argue underperforming schools and achievement gaps necessitate the reforms, which they say would make students more competitive when they enter college and the work force.
But opponents say the measures are moving too quickly, do not provide proper regulations for new schools and would strip communities of control over their local districts and instead put the power in the hands of corporations and the state.
To help readers make sense of the proposals, Patch has put together a handy tutorial on the education reform package.
What's on the table
(See the attached PDFs to review the full bills.)
House bill 6004 and Senate bill 1358: The bills require a survey of all public school buidlings and empower the state Educational Achievement Authority to make decisions about how to use vacant buildings currently under the control of local school districts.
House bill 5923: The bill would issue special designations for single-gender, online and "globally competitive" schools, the latter of which could recruit students from anywhere in the world. International students would pay tuition to attend Michigan public schools. The bill also lets employers sponsor public schools.
Michigan Public Education Finance Act: Gov. Rick Snyder commissioned this draft measure created by the Oxford Foundation, an educational think tank. The 302-page proposal would replace the School Aid Act of 1979, which determines how public schools are funded.
The draft measure allows students to choose which district they attend; permits per-pupil funding splits so students can attend more than one district; expands online learning; provides $2,500 per semester to students who graduate early, up to $10,000; and converts the school year to an all-year configuration.
Pros and cons
“I think it will potentially drive real change for better learning. So, in that respect, if you believe schools are not doing a very good job today and you believe they do a better job afterward, then yes, it could be disruptive for some people’s careers. People spent as much time analyzing the reforms as they spend with rhetoric." – Lansing attorney Richard McLellan who drafted the Michigan Public Education Finance Act on mlive.com
"These bills set the stage for a complete corporate takeover of our public schools, and the Michigan Public Education Finance Act represents the 'final nail in the coffin' and death of Michigan's public school system. In a nutshell: Our public schools will not be public anymore. They will be controlled by Wall Street." – Rep. Ellen Lipton (D-27th District)
Ask your own questions at information meetings
A series of informational meetings has been schedule throughout Oakland County to help answer questions about the proposals. The schedule is as follows:
- Monday, Dec. 3, 4 p.m. Rochester High School
- Monday, Dec. 3, 6:30 pm. 180 S. Livernois, Rochester 48307
- Tuesday, Dec. 4, 4 p.m. Clarkston Jr. High School
- Tuesday, Dec. 4, 6:30 p.m. 6595 Waldon Road, Clarkston 48346
For more on this topic in Birmingham
- Letter to the Editor: State Education Legislation is 'Bad for Birmingham'
- BLOG: Hey Teacher! (and Mom and Dad) Leave Those Kids Alone!
- Learn About the Education Reform Plan the School Board Calls 'Bad for Birmingham'
- Letter to the Editor: Birmingham Parent Wary of Education Legislation