Birmingham Police Investigate Rash of Downtown Thefts
Items were taken from several downtown Birmingham shops, from Bec and Sam's to Backcountry North, in two separate incidents last Saturday.
Several suspects are wanted in connection with a string of thefts at various Birmingham shops along Maple Road last Saturday.
According to Birmingham Police Cmdr. Terry Kiernan, police are investigating two separate incidents, during which merchandise was taken from Bec and Sam's, Anthropologie, Beauty by RX, the Spice and Tea Exchange, Sweet Thing and Backcountry North.
Dearborn Heights woman believed to be behind string of thefts along Maple
In the first incident, police are searching for a 33-year-old woman from Dearborn Heights with several outstanding warrants from Birmingham and other area police departments. The woman is also believed to be connected to several other retail thefts in Birmingham.
According to police reports, the thefts occurred sometime between 11:25 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. last Saturday, Oct. 27. The woman was first noticed at Bec and Sam's, where she paid with a check. An employee there called the bank to verify the check after the woman left and discovered it was fraudulent.
The employee found the woman at Anthropologie, and employees there searched the woman's bag, finding merchandise that had been taken from Anthropologie, the Spice and Tea Exchange, and Beauty by RX.
The woman managed to elude store employee and fled the scene in a car. Later, police discovered the woman had also taken merchandise from Sweet Thing earlier that day.
Jacket taken from Backcountry North, police believe suspects involved in other thefts
A second retail fraud incident occurred later that Saturday, around 1:45 p.m. at Backcountry North. According to police reports, store employees noticed two suspicious-looking women standing next to a Patagonia jacket near the front door.
After the women left the store, employees discovered the jacket was missing. The woman were described as weighing around 200 pounds and were between 5-foot-2-inches and 5-foot-5-inches in height. Both were wearing dark-colored clothing.
Police believe the women are connected to a credit card theft at J. McLaughlin on Oct. 14 as well as several other thefts in the area.
Racer Boy
9:22 am on Friday, November 2, 2012
Our police department believes foot patrols are not as effective a deterent as having a patrol car driving around the city. Seems like a visible police presence on the street should be reconsidered. BTW: to complete the description of the criminals it should be noted that they were both black women. The Patch doesn't seem to believe in complete descriptions.
Debbie Thomas
11:20 am on Friday, November 2, 2012
Race and gender are necessary to describing criminals--also things like height and weight. If I want to be on the alert, they help--a lot. To deny this info from the public is just plain wrong.
Laura Houser
11:44 am on Friday, November 2, 2012
Racer and Debbie:
Our descriptions of suspects are provided by the Birmingham Police Department and their reports. Per Patch policy, we only report suspects' race when there is a very detailed physical description — such as specific clothing, hair color or distinguishing markings. When police only provide very basic information (such as weight and height), we will omit the suspects' race — IF it is provided — until we learn more information. To not do so, we believe, is inflammatory.
In addition, you will notice that we do not provide suspects' race when they are "white" or any other race. We would not simply say a "black man" just as we wouldn't say "a white man." Both are unhelpful. Please email me at Laura.Houser@patch.com if you have more questions about this policy.
Debbie Thomas
8:33 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
I don't understand. What behaviors do you consider to be "inflammatory"? What behaviors would you fear would happen if you would release all the known info of perps, including race?
uknowimright
7:31 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
I feel that this racial sensitivity has gone beyond the level of common sense and the desire not to offend others. It's gotten to the point where unless you are white, you can't speak of or discuss another ethnic group. It's absolutely asinine. Maybe people should get thicker skins. Besides, I've been hearing about these two black women who've been on a theft spree since around 2009, when they first went to the shopping center on 14 Mile and John R over by Oakland Mall and literally walked out of the Ulta store with $400 in stolen beauty products. Yep, same two women - one a heavyset black female between 30-40 and about 5-4, weighing over 200 lbs. and wearing blonde weave/wig, and a younger, very slim black woman around 5-6 and 120 lbs. and with long black hair. They escaped in a gold SUV.
Time to take these two off the streets!
Debbie Thomas
8:28 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
Thank you for the description. You know customers can be caught up in crime situations in stores. I will watch out for both these types. It sounds like either one could drop me easily. Seriously.
uknowimright
7:32 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
Apologies, I meant to say, "unless you are NOT white."
Debbie Thomas
8:37 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
I won't assume what the Patch fears until the editor answers my question in that regard. I am interested in what she has to say. Is this a local Patch policy or a national Patch policy? Right now, I have more questions than assumptions about the policy and I want to hear the editor out.
Debbie Thomas
10:35 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012
I just read the Eagle (10-31-12) account of the above crimes. They provide numerous identifying clues about the criminals, including the race. If I am to believe the Patch, they did not have access to the many clues the Eagle did. OR is the Patch handing the community a load of mularkey? I await the editor's response.
Laura Houser
10:55 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012
Debbie: Per Patch's company-wide policy, we only include race when it is used as part of broader description, when there is a reasonable expectation the person can be identified.
Inflammatory, by definition, means arousing passion or strong emotion, particularly anger or suspicion. Naming a suspect's race (such as if they were black) with little else to describe them could arouse suspicion of all black people.
Again, if you have any more questions about this policy, email me at Laura.Houser@patch.com. I would happy to discuss this if you're still concerned.
Racer Boy
2:46 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
Could there possibly be a more lame policy than that of the Patch? You have gender, height, weight and in most cases dress as descriptors of these criminals. The Police believe the descriptions are both accurate and helpful in the attempt to solve these crimes as do other local publications. Yet, the Patch doesn't? Why bother printing the article at all...I am sure some find just the publication of crimes to be "inflammatory". The Patch's editorial position is ludicrous, senseless, shallow and NOT in the best interest of the respectful and law abiding citizenry they supposed serve.
Debbie Thomas
10:39 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
Followup--yes, the policy is insulting--I might be "inflamed" if the word "black" is used in a crime story. Business publications report much angst in the national co. Forbes (5/24/12) reported 2011 revenues at Patch of $13 million and costs of $160 million.
Debbie Thomas
3:56 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
Readers, I have complained about the policy to the national corporation at patch.com. From what I can tell, the company is owned by AOL. I think the president is Warren Webster.
Long Island Dave
11:55 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
AND FOR YOUR FREE VIEWING PLEASURE:
2016: Obama's America - Entire Documentary Here
http://www.butthurt.co/obama/2016